NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Braiding v Charles Sturt University [2015] NSWCATAD 242 Hearing dates: 29 September 2015 Date of orders: 20 November 2015 Decision date: 20 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: N Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: 1. Allegation 3, that the Respondent breached s 52 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), is dismissed. 2. The applicant's application to amend the complaint to add Points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(a) and (b), 6, 7 (a) and (b), 8(a), (b) and (c), 9 and 10 of the Points of Claim document is refused. 3. Within 3 weeks of the date of these reasons the applicant is to file Amended Points of Claim in accordance with these reasons. 4. The matter is listed for a case conference at 2 pm on 16 December 2015. Catchwords: JURISDICTION – content of complaint referred by President of Anti-Discrimination Board to Tribunal – no exercise of discretion by President to decline any part of the complaint – whether whole of original complaint referred PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend complaint to include additional complaints – relevant considerations Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), s 89B, 92, 102, 103 Cases Cited: Commonwealth v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1998) 152 ALR 182 Deva v University of Western Sydney [2008] NSWCA 137 Elliott v Nanda (2001) 11 FCR 240) Horne v Press Clough Joint Venture (1994) EOC 92-556 IW v City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; (1997) 146 ALR 696 at 702; Molony v Golden Ponds Corporation Pty Ltd (1995) EOC 92-674) Sydney University Post Graduate Representative Association v Minister for Transport Services [2006] NSWADT 83 Texts Cited: Rees Rice and Allen, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law (2nd ed 2014, The Federation Press) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Gerard Braiding (Applicant) Charles Sturt University (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate