NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dulhunty; R v Roach [2015] NSWSC 1747 Hearing dates: 26 and 27 October 2015 Date of orders: 30 November 2015 Decision date: 30 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [115] and [116] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Conspiracy – Manipulation of share price by two directors of a publicly listed company – Where offending involved multiple trades and substantial monetary investment – Whether the actions of another investor mitigated the offending – Where offenders were not motivated by immediate personal gain but would likely have derived benefit in the longer term – Where neither offender had any prior convictions – Where there was extra curial punishment in the case of each offender in terms of loss of career – Good prospects of rehabilitation in each case – No real likelihood of further offending – Expressions of remorse by each offender – Early plea of guilty in each case - Where counsel for each offender accepted that a sentence of imprisonment was warranted but submitted that each offender should be immediately released on a recognisance or considered for some other sentencing option which did not require actual full time custody – Where Crown submitted that any sentence of imprisonment which was imposed should require a period of actual full time custody to be served by each offender – Where offending was serious and sustained over a long period - Necessity to maintain the integrity of financial markets – Importance of general deterrence – Term of imprisonment imposed in each case requiring a period of actual custody to be served Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Cases Cited: Cameron v R [2002] HCA 6; (2002) 209 CLR 339 Cappis v R [2015] NSWCCA 138 Danial v R [2008] NSWCCA 15 DPP (Cth) v Gow [2015] NSWCCA 208 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 McMahon v R [2011] NSWCCA 147 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1999) 194 CLR 610 R v Boulden [2006] NSWSC 1274 R v Hinchcliffe [2013] NSWCCA 327 R v Jacobson [2014] VSC 592 R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 527 R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Pogson, Lapham and Martin [2012] NSWCCA 225; (2012) 82 NSWLR 60 R v Storey [1998] 1 VR 359 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222; (2013) 235 A Crim R 265 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina - Crown Peter Roach - Offender Robert Venour Dulhunty - Offender Representation: Counsel: S Rushton SC - Crown H Dhanji SC and R Pontello - Offender Roach M Thangaraj SC – Offender Dulhunty
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate