NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lago v R [2015] NSWCCA 296 Hearing dates: 26 October 2015 Decision date: 27 November 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Button J at [70]; Fagan J at [71] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – whether uncharged criminal conduct treated as an aggravating factor – whether unfair disparity between applicant's and co-offender's sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 32 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Ch 3, Pt 3 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25(1), 32(1), Sch 1 Cases Cited: Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67; 205 A Crim R 274 Einfeld v R [2010] NSWCCA 87; 200 A Crim R 1 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189; 175 A Crim R 40 Peiris v R [2014] NSWCCA 58 R v Wei Pan [2005] NSWCCA 114 Rae v R [2011] NSWCCA 211 SBF v R [2009] NSWCCA 231; 198 A Crim R 219 Sills v R [2011] NSWCCA 271 The Queen v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Velez v R [2015] NSWCCA 177 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Lago (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: G Wendler (Applicant) N Noman SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate