NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nairn v R [2015] NSWCCA 290 Hearing dates: 16 November 2015 Date of orders: 25 November 2015 Decision date: 25 November 2015 Before: Johnson J at [1] Beech-Jones J at [2] R.S. Hulme AJ at [44] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted; and
(2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING – violent rampage – multiple victims – one victim stabbed 33 times and lost an eye – multiple offences including wounding with intention to cause grievous bodily harm – applicant suffered from mental illness – aggregate sentence of twelve years imprisonment including non-parole period of seven years and six months imprisonment – whether sentence manifestly excessive – relevance of mental illness – factors that arise in relation to mentally ill offenders can negate each other – Veen (No 2) – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 – s 33(1)(a), s 47, s 97(1), s 114(1)(a) - Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 - s 32(1) - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 44(2C), s 54B(4), s 53A(2) Cases Cited: - Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 - Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 - Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 - Engert v R (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 - Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 - Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 - PD v R [2012] NSWCCA 242 - The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 - SHR v R [2014] NSWCCA 94 - Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nathan Shane Nairn (aka West) – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: W.J. Hunt – Applicant E. Balodis – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate