NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Damien v JKAM Investments Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 368 Hearing dates: 12 November 2015 Decision date: 26 November 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Simpson JA at [2] Tobias AJA at [3] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – respondent seeks to enforce alleged building work debt – identity of contracting entity in dispute – whether primary judge erred in finding that the appellant had contracted with Architectural Collections Pty Ltd (ACPL) – whether use of post-contractual conduct permissible - whether debt validly assigned by ACPL to the respondent
PROCEDURE – whether primary judge erred by not allowing the appellant to tender email correspondence Cases Cited: Brambles Holdings Pty Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61; 53 NSWLR 153 Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd v JKAM Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 952 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Railway Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 JKAM Investments Pty Ltd v Damien [2015] NSWSC 272 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Karl Damien (Appellant) JKAM Investments Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Cohen (Appellant) G D McDonald (Respondent)
Solicitors: Duffy Law Group (Appellant) JK Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/106460 Publication restriction: Not Applicable Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: [2015] NSWSC 272 Date of Decision: 20 March 2015 Before: Rein J File Number(s): 2014/21077; 2014/22761
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate