NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bravo v R [2015] NSWCCA 302 Hearing dates: 30 November 2015 Decision date: 30 November 2015 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – range of child sexual assault offences committed against stepdaughter – aggregate sentence – a number of errors alleged concerning specification of indicative sentences – Crown concessions as to some errors alleged including Muldrock error – sentencing discretion – whether some other sentence warranted in law – aggregate sentence imposed within range – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61M, 66A, 66C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 44(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Cases Cited: JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 McIntosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 Saddler v R [2009] NSWCCA 83; 194 A Crim R 452 Texts Cited: Criminal Law News (2015) 22(8) Crim LN [3572] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bravo (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Carroll (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate