NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vai v R [2015] NSWCCA 303 Hearing dates: 30 November 2015 Decision date: 30 November 2015 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – multiple armed robbery offences – on parole for similar – whether sentence manifestly excessive – where applicant has history of violence and breaching court orders – guarded findings on sentence as to applicant's rehabilitation prospects – sentence clearly within range – appeal devoid of merit – consideration given to s 18 Criminal Appeal Act – leave refused Legislation Cited: Courts Legislation Further Amendment Act 1995 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 97(2), 344A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 18 Cases Cited: JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 R v Costache (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 13 November 1990, unrep) R v Cuthbertson [1974] 1 NSWLR 672 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Valeaiatu Vai (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Pararajasingham (Applicant) Ms M Cinque SC (Crown)
Solicitors: CBD Criminal Defence Laywers Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/157716 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 26 May 2014 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2012/157716
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate