NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smilevska v Smilevska [2015] NSWSC 1794 Hearing dates: 9, 10, 11, 12 November 2015 Date of orders: 30 November 2015 Decision date: 30 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: The first defendant requires a tutor. Directions made for the nomination and appointment of a tutor or tutors. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - issue raised in the hearing of proceedings whether the defendant, who appeared without the intervention of a tutor, is "a person under legal incapacity" within Civil Procedure Act 2005 and Uniform Civil Procedure Rule 7.13 - defendant gives evidence and has some difficulty in answering questions - plaintiff alleges the defendant is a person under legal incapacity and applies for a stay of proceedings until a tutor appointed - whether the plaintiff is a person under legal incapacity and if so who should be appointed as her tutor - whether certain nominees as tutor suitable for appointment. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 3, 80 Conveyancing Act 1919, s 54A Evidence Act 1995, s 20 Powers of Attorney Act 2003, ss 21, 36 Real Property Act 1900, s 42 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Part 7, Division 4, rr 6.24, 7.1 Cases Cited: Douglas v Douglas [2004] NSWSC 279 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Guthrie v Spence [2009] NSWCA 369; 78 NSWLR 225 Masterman-Lister v Brutton & Co [2003] All ER 162 R v Registrar of Melbourne County Court; Ex parte Farrington [1927] VLR 406; (1927) 33 ALR 270 Rappard v Williams [2013] NSWSC 1279 a Saravinovska v Saravinovski (No. 5) [2015] NSWSC 128 Slaveski v Victoria [2009] VSC 596 Steinecke (bht Robert John Gardos) v Peter Martin Wayne, Diane Lindner, Beate Stricker, Gerhard Levy; Re Estate of Henry Herbert Stricker & Karl Heinz Lindner [2011] NSWSC 428 Stokes v McCourt [2014] NSWSC 61 Texts Cited: B. Collier and S. Lindsay, Powers of Attorney in Australia and New Zealand (1st ed. 1992, Federation Press) Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Plaintiff: Temjana Smilevska First Defendant: Blaguna Smilevska Second Defendant: Blagoja Smilevski Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: D. Liebhold; A. Stevens First Defendant: T.G.R. Parker SC Second Defendant: submitting appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate