NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd v Mitchell-Innes [2015] NSWCA 381 Hearing dates: 8 and 9 October 2015 Decision date: 02 December 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Ward JA at [130]; Leeming JA at [137] Decision: (1) Appeal in relation to the assessment of damages allowed.
(2) Appeal on liability dismissed.
(3) Set aside Orders 1, 2 and 3 made at first instance on 8 December 2014.
(4) Direct that the parties file and serve written submissions concerning the quantification of damages and costs orders as follows:
(a) The appellant within 14 days of this judgment. (b) The respondent within a further 14 days. (c) Any response by the appellant within a further 7 days. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT LAW – termination of employment – summary dismissal – whether employee exhibited signs of intoxication at work training course – whether employee intoxicated in a public place – whether employee intoxicated at a work-related social function – whether intoxication warranted summary dismissal for serious misconduct in serious circumstances
DAMAGES – termination of employment – whether, if summary dismissal not available, employee would have been terminated on notice Legislation Cited: Long Service Leave Act 1955 (NSW), s 4 Cases Cited: Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell [1933] HCA 8; 49 CLR 66 Clouston & Co Ltd v Corry [1906] AC 122 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 54; 174 CLR 64 Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell [2000] HCA 64 75 ALJR 312 McDonald v Parnell Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd (2007) FCA 1903; 168 IR 375 Murray Irrigation Ltd v Balsdon [2006] NSWCA 253 67 NSWLR 73 New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 Rankin v Marine Power International Pty Ltd (2001) VSC 150; 107 IR 117 State of New South Wales v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133; 54 NSWLR 526 Tasmania Development & Resources v Martin [2000] FCA 414; 97 IR 66 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Hayden Enterprises Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 130 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 101; 233 ALR 687 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Willis Australia Group Services Pty Ltd (Appellant) Donald Mitchell-Innes (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Kirk SC/M Seck (Appellant) J Pearce (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate