NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baleiovalau v R [2015] NSWCCA 305 Hearing dates: 19 November 2015 Decision date: 02 December 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Bellew J at [78]; R S Hulme AJ at [79] Decision: 1 Grant leave to appeal.
2 Appeal allowed.
3 The sentence imposed in the District Court on 21 August 2014 is quashed.
4 The applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years with a non-parole period of 2 years commencing on 11 April 2012 and expiring on 10 April 2014, with a balance of term of 3 years commencing on 11 April 2014 and expiring on 10 April 2017. The Court notes that the applicant is now eligible for release on parole. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – applicant sentenced to term of imprisonment for attempted robbery offence committed in 2004 contrary to s 97(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – accumulation of sentence for 2004 offence on earlier sentence for similar armed robbery offences in 2005 resulted in an overall term of 12 years with an overall non-parole period of 10 years – whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of 2004 offence – whether judge failed to give effect to principle of totality – whether overall term of sentence in proportion to overall non-parole period excessive – whether judge erred by comparing applicant's circumstances with those of an alleged co-offender
CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – resentence – likely sentence imposed if applicant dealt with for all offences at same time – finding of special circumstances on the basis of accumulation Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 97 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Cases Cited: Baleiovalau v R [2009] NSWCCA 153 Barrett v R [2011] NSWCCA 213 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Kentwell v R [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 201 LG v R [2012] NSWCCA 249 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 59 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; 189 CLR 295 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Wu v R [2011] NSWCCA 102; 211 A Crim R 88 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tomu Baleiovalau (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: W Hunt (Applicant) H Baker (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate