NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Isika v R [2015] NSWCCA 304 Hearing dates: 14 October 2015 Decision date: 04 December 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Hall J at [20]; Bellew J at [21] Decision: (1) That the appellant's convictions on counts four and five charged in the Indictment issued in June 2014 by the Director of Public Prosecutions be quashed.
(2) That there be a new trial on those counts. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – indecent assault – act of indecency – appeal against conviction – whether a miscarriage of justice occurred as a result of trial judge's direction to the jury – whether trial judge's direction contravened the principles in Black v R [1993] HCA 71; 179 CLR 44 – whether trial judge's direction placed undue pressure on the jury to reach a decision - whether trial judge encouraged jurors to agree to compromise verdicts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61L, 61N Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Cases Cited: ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Black v R [1993] HCA 71; 179 CLR 44. R v TK [2009] NSWCCA 151; 74 NSWLR 299 R v Accused (CA 87/88)(1988) 2 NZLR 46; 3 CRNZ 301 R v Walhein (1952) 36 Cr App R 167 Timbery v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 355; 180 A Crim R 232 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Isika (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Loukas SC (Appellant) S Dowling SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate