NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Howard [2015] NSWSC 1811 Hearing dates: 6 November 2015 Decision date: 01 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: (1) Order made under s 5C Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 subjecting Kevin Howard to a high risk sex offender extended supervision order for a period of five years commencing 2 December 2015. (2) Order made under s 11 of the Act directing Kevin Howard to comply with the conditions set out in Schedule A to these orders for the duration of Order 1. (3) Order made permitting the reports of Dr Andrew Ellis dated 28 September 2015 and Dr Jeremy O'Dea dated 6 October 2015 to be provided to any Corrective Services New South Wales Community Corrections officer involved in the supervision of the defendant, and any psychologist and/or psychiatrist involved in the supervision of, or the psychological and/or psychiatric care or assessment of, the defendant. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – high risk sex offender – application for Extended Supervision Order – threshold requirements for making an ESO met – defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious sex offence if not kept under supervision – dispute about term of the order – dispute about certain conditions to be imposed under s 11 of the Act – appropriate to make an ESO for a term of 5 years and not for a lesser period having regard to the evidence and the primary purpose of the Act – evidence and prior convictions disclosed serious and extensive history of sexual offending – certain risk factors remain – conditions imposed in accordance with Schedule Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes Act 1900 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 340 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWSC 605 Cornwall v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Fardon v Attorney-General (2004) 223 CLR 575 New South Wales v Kokkotas [2014] NSWSC 1624 New South Wales v Richardson (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 276; (2011) 210 A Crim R 220 Nikolaidis v Satouris [2014] NSWCA 448 State of New South Wales v Anthony Joseph Russell [2015] NSWSC 488 State of New South Wales v Darrego [2011] NSWSC 1449 State of New South Wales v Galanis [2015] NSWSC 133 State of New South Wales v Hill [2015] NSWSC 489 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Final) [2011] NSWSC 307 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Kevin Howard (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Hammond (Plaintiff) P Coady (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate