NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Young v King (No. 8) [2015] NSWLEC 187 Hearing dates: 30 November 2015 Date of orders: 01 December 2015 Decision date: 01 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Sheahan J Decision: The Applicant's claims for costs against the 8th, 9th, 10th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 18th Respondents are summarily dismissed, and, the Applicant is to pay those respondents' costs on their motions for summary dismissal. Catchwords: COSTS: Applications for summary dismissal of costs claims made by an unsuccessful party against a number of non-parties. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 Married Persons (Equality of Status) Act 1996 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bankstown City Council v Mohamad El Dana [2009] NSWLEC 68 Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; 162 CLR 1 FPM Constructions v City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404 Harrison v Schipp [2001] NSWCA 13 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Re Felicity, FM v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (No 4) [2015] NSWCA 19 Reichel v Magrath [1889) 14 APP CAS 665 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198 Symphony Group Plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; 60 ALR 68 Young v Hones [2014] NSWCA 337 Young v Hones (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1429 Young v King [2004] NSWLEC 93 Young v King (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 236 Young v King (No 6) [2015] NSWLEC 111 Yu v Cao [2015] NSWCA 276 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Margo Young (Applicant) Brendan King (First respondent) Kristina King (Second respondent) Jason Hones (Third respondent) Hones Lawyers (Fourth respondent) Ian Hemmings (Fifth respondent) Stephen Perrens (Sixth respondent) Hughes Trueman Pty Limited (Seventh respondent) Warwick Davies (Eighth respondent) Stephen Noel Griffiths (Ninth respondent) Robert Charles Springett (Tenth respondent) Michael Brearley (Eleventh respondent) Ross Fraser (Twelfth respondent) Tony Tuxworth (Thirteenth respondent) Copeland Lethbridge (Fourteenth respondent) Bee & Lethbridge Pty Limited (Fifteenth respondent) Geoff Goodyer (Sixteenth respondent) Victor Schubert (Seventeenth respondent) Warringah Shire Council (Eighteenth respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate