NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tofighi v Adami [2015] NSWCATAP 260 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 03 December 2015 Decision date: 03 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Wass, SC Senior Member K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, a hearing on costs is dispensed with. (2) In the appeal decision of Omid Tofighi t/as Sovereign Buildings v Anahita Adami and Mansoor Adami [2015] NSWCATAP 189, the Appellant is to pay the Respondents' costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: APPEAL – Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) –whether special circumstances exist warranting an order for costs. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Wright v Commissioner of Police (Costs) [2015] NSWCATAP 69 Category: Costs Parties: Omid Tofighi trading as Sovereign Buildings — Appellant Anahita and Mansoor Adami — Respondents Representation: Mr Atkinson, solicitor, for the Respondent File Number(s): AP 14/46395 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 29 April 2014 Before: S F Smith, General Member File Number(s): HB 13/27279 and HB 13/04832
reasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate