NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Ali Hussein pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 1855 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 07 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – application under Pt 7 Div 3 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – doubt or question as to mitigating circumstance Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) Criminal Law Amendment Act 1883 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application of Peter James Holland under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] HCA 28; (2003) 214 CLR 318 Manly; Hussein; Barghachoun v R [2014] NSWCCA 59 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 PK v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 263 R v Henry (1996) 46 NSWLR 346 Sinkovich v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383; (2013) 85 NSWLR 783 Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Hussein (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Carolyn Davenport SC (Applicant) N M Kelly (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate