NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Potier v The Responsible Officer, NSW State Parole Authority [2015] NSWCA 391 Hearing dates: 3 December 2015 Decision date: 03 December 2015 Before: Beazley P; Leeming JA Decision: 1. The summons filed 27 November 2015 and the notice of motion filed 27 November 2015 be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – application for leave – interlocutory application for criminal justice stay warrant – whether reasonable prospects of success – leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Pt 7 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 474D Criminal Appeal Rules, r 50C Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW), s 4 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 14, 151, 189 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 23 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 36.16 Cases Cited: Ah-See v Heilpern [2000] NSWSC 627 Application of Malcolm Potier [2015] NSWCCA 199 Bruce Edward Gall v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 152 CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64; 226 CLR 1 Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1023; 171 FCR 38 Potier v R [2014] NSWCCA 157 Potier v R [2015] NSWCCA 130 Potier v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 359 Potier v The New South Wales State Parole Authority [2015] NSWSC 1775 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Malcolm Huntley Potier (Applicant) The Responsible Officer, NSW State Parole Authority (First Respondent) The Minister for the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (Second Respondent) The Commissioner for the Department of Corrective Services (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person Submitting appearance (First Respondent) A Markus (Second Respondent) AM Mitchelmore (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate