NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Helensburgh Property Management Pty Ltd v Brady [2015] NSWSC 1861 Hearing dates: 3 and 4 December 2015 Date of orders: 09 December 2015 Decision date: 09 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Bergin CJ in Eq Decision: Agreement to be rectified to include a post-employment restraint for 6 months and 15 kilometres from the office at which defendant employed. Plaintiff has established defendant in breach of Employment Agreement. Matter listed for hearing on damages. Catchwords: CONTRACT – where defendant employed as property manager in real estate agency – where employment agreement included obligations in respect of confidential information – whether defendant in breach in poaching clients, setting up business in competition and misusing confidential information whilst still employed with plaintiff.
RECTIFICATION – where post-employment restraint in original contract of 6 months and 15 kilometres from office – where new contract included different restraint – 12 months in area not including the relevant office - whether mistake – whether agreement should be rectified. Legislation Cited: Restraints of Trade Act 1976 Cases Cited: Aspro's Pty Ltd v Hayter & Ors [2005] ANZ ConvR 425 Betts v Conolly (1970) 120 CLR 417 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 First Conferences Services Ltd v Bracchi [2009] EWHC 2176 (Ch) Hivac Ltd v Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd [1946] Ch 169 Maralinga Pty Ltd v Major Enterprises Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 336 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37 Noon v Bondi Beach Astra Retirement Village Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 202 Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd v Debelak (1989) 89 ALR 275 Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80 Westpac Banking Corp v Tanzone Pty Ltd (2000) 9 BPR 17,521 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Helensburgh Property Management Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Emma Elizabeth Brady (1st Defendant) All Over Rentals Pty Ltd (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: TS Hale SC/J Gatland (Plaintiff) RA Parsons (1st and 2nd Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate