NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: He v Yeung [2015] NSWCA 392 Hearing dates: 27 November 2015 Date of orders: 10 December 2015 Decision date: 10 December 2015 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Bergin CJ in Eq [3] Decision: Leave to appeal refused. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – where ultimate challenge, if successful, would amount to an adjustment of well less than $100,000 – matter treated as application for leave to appeal – no matter of principle or public importance – no prospect of success of proposed appeal Cases Cited: Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qin He (Applicant) Simon Yeung (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Qin He (Applicant in person) PM Barham (Respondent)
Solicitors: Bowles Lawyers Pty Ltd (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/296848 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Equity Date of Decision: 18 September 2014 Before: Young AJ File Number(s): 2013/355288
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate