NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Taouk v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1512 Hearing dates: 1 December 2015 Date of orders: 09 December 2015 Decision date: 09 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown ASC Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld; 2. The Application to modify Development Consent No 497/2015/HB for the demolition of all existing buildings and construction of 16 units for housing for seniors or people with a disability at 157A-159 Old Northern Road, Castle Hill is determined by approving the modifications sought. 3. As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent Development Consent No 497/2015/HB is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure A; 4. The exhibits, other than Exhibits 4, A and B, are returned. Catchwords: MODIFICATION: modification of the approved housing for seniors or people with a disability development by the addition of one additional unit and two additional car spaces – whether there is an unacceptable impact on the character and streetscape – whether the floor space ratio is acceptable – whether the proposal has inconsistent height and bulk compared to adjoining properties. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191 Taouk & Ors v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1097 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Taouk (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr G McKee, solicitor (Applicant) Mr A Seton, solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate