NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chan v Acres [2015] NSWSC 1885 Hearing dates: 29/9/2015, 30/09/2015, 01/09/2015, 02/10/2015, 06/10/2015, 07/10/2015, 08/10/2015, 12/10/2015, 13/10/2015, 14/10/2015 and 15/10/2015 Date of orders: 11 December 2015 Decision date: 11 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: McDougall J Decision: Parties to bring in draft orders to give effect to reasons. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – building and construction – where plaintiffs purchased a house that had been defectively renovated by the vendor, the first defendant – second defendant no longer a party to proceedings – where vendor had engaged an engineer, the third defendant, to carry out inspections at particular times – where vendor had also engaged the local council, the fourth defendant, to act as Principal Certifying Authority
STATUTE – case against vendor – statutory warranties set out in the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – warranties breached
NEGLIGENCE – case against engineer – whether the engineer owed a duty of care at common law to use reasonable care to avert the risk that subsequent purchasers might suffer pure economic loss – relevant authorities – requirement that purchasers must have been vulnerable – analysis of vulnerability to proceed by reference to the salient features of the relationship – assumption of responsibility and known reliance as important factors – inability to protect one's self from harm as another important factor – where no evidence of assumption of responsibility on the part of the engineer or known reliance on the part of the purchasers – where purchasers were, to some extent, able to protect themselves – no duty of care – further finding that had a duty been owed, breach would be made out, but not causation
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate