NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Glenn (a pseudonym) [2015] NSWSC 1888 Hearing dates: 7 December 2015 Decision date: 07 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: The applicant is required to show cause pursuant to s 16A of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) since he has previously been convicted of a serious personal violence offence within s 16B. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – bail – whether applicant for bail required to show cause under Bail Act 2013 (NSW) – definition of "serious personal violence offence" – whether conviction for an offence which is no longer in the same terms and has been renumbered attracts the show cause requirement
CRIMINAL LAW – offence of kidnapping – nature and effect of changes in 2001 – whether s 90A, 85A and 86 amount to the same offence for the purposes of the definition of "serious personal violence offence"
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – effect of Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) – ambulatory nature of provisions – relevance of legislative purpose – use of present tense to be examined in context – effect on definition of repeal and remaking of offence – whether contrary intention established to displace effect of ss 5 and 68 of Interpretation Act Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), s 16B Bail Act 1978 (NSW), s 9B Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), Pt 3, ss 61J, 79, 85A, 86, 90A Crimes (Amendment) Act 1961 (NSW), s 2 Crimes Amendment (Gang and Vehicle Related Offences) Act 2001 (NSW), Sch 1, cll 5, 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2012 (NSW), Sch 1, cl 3 Criminal Legislation Amendment Act 2001 (NSW), Sch 3, cl 2 Interpretation Act 1978 (NSW), ss 5, 33, 35, 68 Public Works Act 1912 (NSW), ss, 126, 126A Cases Cited: Albury City Council v North Albury Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 220 Davis v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 392 Texts Cited: Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation, (7th ed, 2011, LexisNexis Butterworths) Second Reading Speech to the Criminal Legislation Amendment Bill 2001 (NSW) (Legislative Assembly, 17 October 2001, page 1758) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glenn (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: E Fletcher (Solicitor) (Applicant) E Freelander (Solicitor) (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate