NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perla v Cavassa [2015] NSWSC 1889 Hearing dates: 2, 8 December 2015 Decision date: 11 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Summons dismissed.
(2) Make no order as to costs.
(3) Decline the plaintiff's application for a certificate under s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW). Catchwords: COSTS – application for judicial review based on failure of Civil and Administrative Tribunal to provide reasons promptly – whether Tribunal should pay plaintiff's costs of judicial review proceedings – reasons were provided in response to email from party – no reason to commence proceedings – no basis to order Tribunal to pay costs.
COSTS – Suitors' Fund – not appropriate to grant certificate in circumstances where plaintiff incurred costs as a consequence of conduct of her legal representative – no error of law of Tribunal to warrant grant of certificate Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 5, 61, 62, Sch 6, cl 11 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Mir Bros Developments Pty Ltd v Atlantic Constructions Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 491 Category: Costs Parties: Elena Perla (Plaintiff) Flora Cavassa (First Defendant) (Submitting Appearance) Civil and Administrative Tribunal of NSW (Second Defendant) NSW Trustee and Guardian (Third Defendant) (Submitting Appearance) Representation: Counsel: P Glissan (Plaintiff) D Galbraith (Solicitor) (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate