NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Peart; R v Sorokin [2015] NSWCCA 321 Hearing dates: 4 December 2015 Date of orders: 16 December 2015 Decision date: 16 December 2015 Before: Ward JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [61]; Fagan J at [62] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal. (2) Set aside the order made by Toner SC DCJ on 9 September 2015 quashing counts 1 and 2 on the indictment presented against Kylie Anne Peart and Daniel Alexander Sorokin on 8 September 2015. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against quashing of two counts on an indictment – commonwealth drug offences – quashed counts charged offences of importing controlled drug, being a drug analogue of a listed border controlled drug – third count charge offence of trafficking same drug, being a listed controlled drug – whether s 301.9(2) of the Criminal Code (Cth) means that if a substance is listed as a controlled drug for the purposes of manufacturing and trafficking offences then it cannot be an analogue of a border controlled drug for the purposes of import and export offences
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Criminal Code (Cth) s 301.9(2) – ordinary meaning of words
WORDS AND PHRASES – "or" – whether should be read distributively Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), ss 15AA, 15AB Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious Drugs, Identity Crime and Other Measures) Act 2012 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5C Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), ss 11.2A, 300.2, 301.1, 301.4, 301.9, 302.4, 307.3 Criminal Code Regulations 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Bailey v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources NSW [2015] NSWCA 318 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1981] HCA 26; (1981) 147 CLR 297 Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill [1991] HCA 28; (1991) 172 CLR 319 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Poulakis (No 3) [2015] ACTSC 191 Re Bolton; Ex Parte Beane [1987] HCA 12; (1987) 162 CLR 514 Re the Minister for Works; ex parte Duffy [2002] WASCA 295 Saeed v Minister of Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; (2010) 241 CLR 252 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Kylie Anne Peart and Alexander Daniel Sorokin (Respondents) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate