NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hair Industrie Penrith Pty Ltd, Hair Industrie Merrylands Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1905 Hearing dates: 25 – 26 August, 3 September 2015 (last written submissions as to orders and costs 10 November 2015) Decision date: 14 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Order that the Third and Fourth Defendants pay the Plaintiff an amount of $41,121.12 in damages and interest on those damages. The Third and Fourth Defendants pay 60% of the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – costs – where Plaintiff successful in part – where three offers of compromise rejected by Plaintiff – where Plaintiff abandoned part of claim – where Defendants made unsuccessful 'no case' application during the hearing – whether to modify costs order to reflect particular matters. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 98, 101 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 42.1, 42.6, 42.34 Cases Cited: - Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 - Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 - Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298 - Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) 8 ATPR 40-748 - Lawrence v Gunner; Gunner v Lawrence [2015] NSWSC 1229 - Milne v Attorney-General (Tasmania) (1956) 95 CLR 460 - Monie v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 15 - Nu Line Construction Group Pty Ltd v Fowler (aka Grippaudo) [2012] NSWSC 816 - Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 - Perisher Blue Pty Ltd v Nair-Smith (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 268 - Perochinsky v Kirschner (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 837 Short v Crawley (No 40) [2008] NSWSC 1302 Category: Costs Parties: Romona Kraissa (Plaintiff) Hair Industrie Penrith Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Hair Industrie Merrylands Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Steve Choukair (Third Defendant) Mohamad Choukair (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Painter SC/J Gatland (Plaintiff) W Chan (25-26 August), R Clark (3 September) (Third and Fourth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate