NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Stewart [2015] NSWCATOD 145 Hearing dates: 16 and 17 November 2015 Date of orders: 15 December 2015 Decision date: 15 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Oscar Shub, Principal Member Dr A Lang, Dental Member Dr Tom Boland, Dental Member Dr Kendra Sundquist, General Member Decision: (1) The Respondent is permitted to continue practising in his capacity as a dental practitioner, subject to the orders in Paragraph 88 of these reasons. (2) The Respondent shall pay the costs of the Applicant Catchwords: Dentist, Impairment, Alcohol Use Disorder, Urine Testing, Breathalyser Testing, Antabuse, Critical Compliance Order Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) (National Law S139B4E, S41P, S165H, S152B, S3A, S5,5D, S163, S 125-127) Cases Cited: R Sudath v HCCC (2012) 84 NSWLR 473 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 HCCC v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 63 HCCC v Dr Della Bruno (2014) NSWCATOD 31
Prakash v HCCC (2006) NSWCA 153 Qasim v HCCC (2015) NSWCA 282 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Dr Douglas Stewart (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Graycar (Applicant)
Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Blands Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 1520120
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate