NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Swiegers v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [2015] NSWDC 298 Hearing dates: Hearing: 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30 April 2015 and 30 June 2015 Decision date: 16 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Justice Price, Chief Judge Decision: Verdict and judgment for the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, the defendant, against Gerhard Frederick Swiegers, the plaintiff Catchwords: CONTRACT – termination of employment contract – whether plaintiff's claim barred by acceptance of early cessation payment – whether claim barred by reason of estoppel, waiver or election – secondment – whether defendant breached contract by failing to develop a role upon return from secondment – whether plaintiff liaised with defendant – consideration of defendant's power of retrenchment – whether retrenchment was genuine – whether decision was made to retrench the plaintiff in November 2007 – whether plaintiff was not advised he was regarded as redundant for in excess of 12 months – treatment of other employees contrasted – whether closure of MDI project had anything to do with the Whistleblower Complaint – whether plaintiff likely to become excess to defendant's staffing requirements – whether genuine effort made to redeploy plaintiff – whether plaintiff actually excess to defendant's staffing requirements – whether plaintiff had future role at the CET Division Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Cases Cited: Ashton v Pratt [2015] NSWCA 12; (2015) 88 NSWLR 281 Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali [2002] 1 AC 251 Banque des Marchands de Moscou (Koupetschesky) v Kindersley [1950] 2 All ER 549 Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; (1990) 170 CLR 394 Goldman Sachs JBWere Services Pty Ltd v Nikolich [2007] FCAFC 120; (2007) 163 FCR 62 Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Ltd [1954] HCA 23; (1954) 91 CLR 112 Karam v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2001] NSWSC 709 Legione v Hateley [1983] HCA 11; (1983) 152 CLR 406 McDermott v Black [1940] HCA 4; (1940) 63 CLR 161 Qantas Airways Ltd v Gubbins (1992) 28 NSWLR 26 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 177; (2014) 315 ALR 243 Technical and Further Education Commission t/as TAFE NSW v Pykett [2014] FWCFB 714; (2014) 240 IR 130 Thorby v Goldberg [1964] HCA 41; (1964) 112 CLR 597 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling & Freezing Co Ltd [1968] HCA 8; (1968) 118 CLR 429 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7; (1988) 164 CLR 387 Wiltrading (WA) Pty Ltd v Lumley General Insurance Ltd [2005] WASCA 106; (2005) 30 WAR 290 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gerhard Frederick Swiegers (Plaintiff) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Gibian (Plaintiff) J Bourke QC and R Sweet (Defendant) Solicitors: Colquhoun Murphy Lawyers (Plaintiff) Norton Rose Fulbright (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/137442
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate