NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aubrey v R [2015] NSWCCA 323 Hearing dates: 26 October 2015 Date of orders: 18 December 2015 Decision date: 18 December 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Button J at [2] Fagan J at [3] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: PRECEDENT – review of previous decision by same court – whether previous decision was wrong
APPEAL – unreasonable verdict – causation – whether proved beyond reasonable doubt that applicant caused HIV infection – consideration of circumstantial evidence
APPEAL – whether trial judge erred by directing jury that recklessness constituted foresight of possibility of some harm – grievous bodily harm – malice – possibility or probability
WORDS AND PHRASES – "inflict" grievous bodily harm – Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 35(1)(b) – "malicious" – "possibility" Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blackwell v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 93; (2011) 81 NSWLR 119 CB v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 134 Chen v R [2013] NSWCCA 116 Cryer v R [2010] NSWCCA 18 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Pengilley v R [2006] NSWCCA 163 R v Annakin (1988) 17 NSWLR 202 R v Aubrey [2012] NSWCCA 254 R v Baker [1999] NSWCCA 129 R v Campbell [1997] 2 VR 593 R v Coleman (1990) 19 NSWLR 467 R v Crabbe [1985] HCA 22; (1985) 156 CLR 464 R v Johns [1978] 2 NSWLR 259 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 R v Moran (1991) 52 A Crim R 440 R v Mostyn [2004] NSWCCA 97 Stokes and Difford v R (1990) 51 A Crim R 25 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Aubrey (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Greg James QC/Peter Lange (Appellant) Huw Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate