NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BC v R [2015] NSWCCA 327 Hearing dates: 12 August 2015 Decision date: 18 December 2015 Before: Simpson JA at [1]; Adams J at [2]; Beech-Jones J at [72]. Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – application under s 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – separate trials – admission of tendency evidence – offences committed between ages 11 and 28 years old – whether evidence of charges admissible as tendency evidence – whether charges should be tried separately
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – application under s 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – tendency evidence – complainants are sisters – possibility of concoction – relevance of concoction in assessing probative value under s 101(2) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – whether probative value of evidence outweighed by prejudicial effect Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 306B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 97, 101, 135 Cases Cited: AE v R [2008] NSWCCA 52 B v R [1992] HCA 68; 175 CLR 599; 63 A Crim R 225 BJS v R (No 1) [2011] NSWCCA 239 BJS v R (No 2) [2013] NSWCCA 123 BP v R; R v BP [2010] NSWCCA 303 DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63; 278 ALR 765 DJW v R [2015] NSWCCA 164 DSJ v R; NS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9; 84 NSWLR 758; 215 A Crim R 349 DSJ v R; NS v R [2014] NSWCCA 77 Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R [2014] NSWCCA 303; 316 ALR 206 FB v R; R v FB [2011] NSWCCA 217 Festa v R [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR 593; 185 ALR 394 Harris v Director of Public Prosecutions [1952] AC 694 Markby v R (1978) 140 CLR 108 Hoch v The Queen [1988] HCA 50; 165 CLR 292 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 JG v R [2014] NSWCCA 138 Jones v R [2014] NSWCCA 280 Leonard v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 267; 164 A Crim R 374 McIntosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184 Pfennig v R (1995) 182 CLR 461 at 482-3; 77 A Crim R 149 R v Dupas (No 3) [2009] VSCA 202; 26 VR 380 R v Ellis [2003] NSWCCA 319; 58 NSWLR 700; 144 A Crim R 1 R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338; 156 A Crim R 308 R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209; (2010) 205 A Crim R 75 R v RN [2005] NSWCCA 413 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 R v SK; SK v R [2011] NSWCCA 292 R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 121; 84 NSWLR 363 Sokolowskyj v R [2014] NSWCCA 55 Texts Cited: Professor J Hunter, "Jurors' Notions of Justice, An Empirical Study of Motivations to Investigate & Obedience to Judicial Directions", September 2013, UNSW Law School M Bagaric, "The community interest in bringing suspects to trial trumps the right to an impartial decision maker – at least in Victoria", (2010) 34(1) Criminal Law Journal 5 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BC (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC (Applicant) N Adams SC/ H Roberts (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate