NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O'Neill v Robertson-Staton [2015] NSWSC 1949 Hearing dates: 22, 23 June 2015 Date of orders: 21 December 2015 Decision date: 21 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Judgment for the plaintiff for possession of the property identified in the Statement of Claim; leave granted to issue a writ of possession forthwith, such writ not to be executed before 1 February 2016; cross-claim dismissed; defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs of her claim and of the cross-claim. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – possession of land – where occupant claiming constructive trust – whether registered proprietor entitled to possession forthwith
TRUSTS – constructive trusts – where mother purchased house for occupation by her adult daughter – unanticipated breakdown in relationship – claim of constructive trust of Baumgartner v Baumgartner kind – whether parties were in joint relationship or endeavour – value of parties' respective contributions Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 23C Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Hill v Hill [2005] NSWSC 863 Muschinkski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Nominal Defendant v Smith [2015] NSWCA 339 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank [2009] NSWCA 268 Swettenham v Wild [2005] QCA 264 West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Janet Mary O'Neill (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Kerri Ann Robertson-Staton (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Peter Staton (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: P Menadue (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant in person Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate