NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Obeid (No 5) [2015] NSWSC 1967 Hearing dates: 17 December 2015 Date of orders: 17 December 2015 Decision date: 17 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The notice of motion filed 14 December 2015 be dismissed. (2) Pursuant to s 8 of the Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), it being necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice, this judgment is not to be published. Catchwords: Criminal Law – application to stay criminal proceedings pending application for special leave to appeal from Obeid v R [2015] NSWCCA 309 – effect of stay would be to cause significant delay in criminal trial – approach to application – same approach as that of intermediate court of criminal appeal considering stay pending application for special leave – factors – R v Elliot – delay in criminal trial as a result of interlocutory appeal is per se prejudicial – assessment of prospects of special leave – proposed questions concern jurisdiction and whether parliamentarian is a public officer for purposes of common law offence of wilful misconduct in public office - nevertheless prospects of special leave being granted very low – applicant unlikely to be successful in appeal – points available if applicant convicted – prejudice to applicant if application not granted – no substantial effect on legal rights – will endure stress and potential reputational damage – less weight attributed to that effect compared with delay to trial – application dismissed Legislation Cited: • Australia Act 1986 (Cth) • Australia Act 1986 (UK) • Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 8 • Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F(3) • Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 128, s 132 • Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Cases Cited: • Abibadra & Ors v The Queen [2011] HCA Trans 171 • Adler v The Queen [2004] HCA Trans 546 • Bacon v Rose & Anor [1972] 2 NSWLR 793 • Jennings Constructions v Burgundy Royale Investments (No 1) [1986] HCA 84; 161 CLR 681 • Michael Aubrey (aka Albury) v The Queen [2013] HCA Trans 110 • Obeid v Ipp (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1852 • Obeid v R [2015] NSWCCA 309 • Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Limited v Maritime Union of Australia (No 2) [1998] HCA 32; 72 ALJR 869 • R v Boston [1923] HCA 59; 33 CLR 386 • R v Chaytor [2011] 1 AC 684 • R v Elliott [1996] HCA 21;185 CLR 250 • R v Obeid [2015] NSWSC 897 • R v Obeid (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1380 • R v Obeid (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1441 • R v Obeid (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1442 • R v Quach [2010] VSCA 106; 201 A Crim R 522 • Rinehart v Welker [2012] NSWCA 1 • Sankey v Whitlam [1978] HCA 43; 142 CLR 1 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina – Applicant Edward Moses Obeid – Respondent Representation: Counsel: P. Neil SC – Crown G. Reynolds SC, S. Nixon and D. Hume – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate