NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Sullivan v R [2015] NSWCCA 329 Hearing dates: 3 August 2015 Decision date: 21 December 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Adams J at [2]; Fagan J at [47]. Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – breach of conditions of extended supervision order – additional criminal offences – possession of child abuse material – seriousness – extent of indicated accumulation – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A(2)(n), s 21A(2)(j) Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 7(4) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91H(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: McEwen v Simmons & Anor [2008] NSWSC 1292 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Sivell v R [2009] NSWCCA 286 State of New South Wales v O'Sullivan [2009] NSWSC 704 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Ron O'Sullivan (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Noman SC (Applicant) M Johnston (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent/Crown) File Number(s): 2012/303403 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 5 September 2014 Before: Yehia DCJ File Number(s): 2012/303403
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate