NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Spruce (No.2) [2015] NSWCATOD 153 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 December 2015 Decision date: 21 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member J Ludington, Occasional Member B Radcliffe, Occasional Member M Cross, Occasional Member Decision: Respondent to pay 80% of the Applicant's costs. Catchwords: COSTS — principles applying to awarding costs under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) — whether presumption displaced that the successful party is ordinarily entitled to recover its costs Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Spruce [2015] NSWCATOD 89 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Lucire v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 182 Ohn v Walton (1995) 36 NSWLR 77 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Williams v Lewer (1974) 2 NSWLR 91 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Leading Edge Australia Pty Ltd v Kiri Te Kanawa (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 568 Shao Chun Bi v Mourad [2010] NSWCA 17 Category: Costs Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Appellant) David Spruce (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Hartstein (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate