NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Urban Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Shearer [2015] NSWCATAP 278 Hearing dates: 11 November 2015 Date of orders: 21 December 2015 Decision date: 21 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R Seiden SC, Principal Member T Simon, Senior Member Decision: (1)Appeal allowed. (2)Decision at first instance set aside. (3)Matter remitted to Tribunal as constituted at first instance. Catchwords: Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) – appeal – costs - exercise of discretion - irrelevant considerations - indulgence principle - whether s 94(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) requires leave or indulgence – just and equitable - entitlement Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 4, 62, 80 Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW), s 53 Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2009, cl 20(4) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), s 68 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 7, 92, 94 Cases Cited: Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 at [14]; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Dee-Tech Pty Limited v Neddam Holdings Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 517 Eddy Lau Constructions Pty Ltd v Transdevelopment Enterprise Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 754 Eddy Lau Constructions Pty Ltd v Transdevelopment Enterprise Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 273 Fordham v Fordyce [2007] NSWCA 129 Hannaford v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 297 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lombard Farms Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADTAP 42 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Muldoon v Church of England Children's Homes Burwood (2011) 80 NSWLR 282 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 Pender v Robwenphi Pty Limited [2008] NSWSC 1144 Pettit v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376; Shepherd v Nestoriadis [2015] NSWSC 348 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 449 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Urban Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd & Anthony John Cosco (appellants) Brett Shearer & Bronwyn Shearer (respondents) Representation: Counsel: G Carolan (appellants) P Bambagiotti (respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate