NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hussain v Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 420 Hearing dates: 11 December 2015 Date of orders: 22 December 2015 Decision date: 22 December 2015 Before: Beazley P [1]; Leeming JA [2]; McDougall J [11] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – formation – where appellants entered into a deed with respondents to pay the latter a sum of money – whether that deed was entered into as a result of duress or unconscionability – where that question depends upon the lawfulness of the respondents' conduct – where appellants had resisted paying money owing to respondents under an earlier agreement – where respondents had withheld performance of a term of the earlier agreement as a negotiating technique to ensure that payment – where earlier agreement contained no term, express or implied, that performance be given promptly – statutory illegality – whether, in the alternative, second respondent had acted unlawfully by breaching its statutory obligations as a 'certifying authority' under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) – where it was not proved that the second respondent had been appointed as a 'certifying authority'
APPEALS – adequacy of reasons – obligation of primary judge to make findings of primary fact – where a central argument depending upon finding that the contract contained an implied term – where primary judge made no findings at all as to terms of the contract – resultant difficulty for appellate court to make disputed findings – where, in any event, no substantial wrong or miscarriage Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 (NSW), s 13 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cll 162A, 162B, 162C Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.53 Cases Cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Karam [2005] NSWCA 344 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Emad Hussain (First Appellant) Buthania Said (Second Appellant) Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Boulos Haykal (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G W McGrath SC / C W Robinson (Appellants) P E King / F Sinclair (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate