NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Medich v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 331 Hearing dates: 21 December 2015 Decision date: 22 December 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ; Beazley P; Hidden J Decision: On the grounds referred to in s 8(1)(a) of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), the Court, pursuant to s 7 of that Act, orders that:
(1) (a) the Schedules to the reasons for judgment;
(b) the following portions of the reasons for judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal:
(i) at para [32]: "that the turning point in his relationship with the deceased was on his return from Hayman Island";
(ii) at para [129]: "the applicant repeatedly disputed the logic that Gattellari had killed the deceased for the applicant's benefit … that the worst thing for him would be to have the deceased killed and evidence of him rhetorically asking how he was going to recover his money with the deceased dead"; and
(iii) at para [173]: "that loans had been made by the applicant's companies to Gattellari's companies";
(c) paras [29], [35], [67]-[89] and [182] of the reasons for judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal;
(d) the following parts of the headnote to the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal: page 4 (paras 6.1 and 6.5); page 5 (para 1(ii)); and page 6 (para 5(i));
are not to be published or disclosed until further order.
(2) Other parts of the reasons for judgment in the appeal, and the Court's orders, are not to be published or disclosed save for disclosure:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate