NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kreutzer v University of Sydney [2015] NSWCATAD 270 Hearing dates: 21 September 2015 Date of orders: 23 December 2015 Decision date: 23 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Prof G Walker - Senior Member Decision: Decision under review affirmed. Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION PUBLIC ACCESS –client privilege –in-house lawyers –independence -communications among non-lawyers –improper purpose. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997; Evidence Act 1995; Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009; Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth). Cases Cited: Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501; AQJ v University of New South Wales [2013] NSWADT 306; Esso Australia Resources Ltd v FCT (1999) 201 CLR 49; Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (No. 7) [1990] 3 All ER 161; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409; Fenwick v Wambo Coal Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 358; Finers v Miro (1991) 1 WLR 35; Grant v Downs (1970) 135 CLR 674; Kang v Kwan [2001] NSWSC 698; Nature Conservation Council of New South Wales v Department of Trade and Investment [2012] NSWADT 195; Raven v University of Sydney [2015] NSWCATAD 104; SL v University of Sydney [2011] NSWADT 65; Seven National News Ltd v News Ltd (2005) 2 to 5 ALR 672; Rich v Harrington (2007) 245 ALR 106; Telstra Corporation Ltd v Minister for Communications (No. 2) [2007] FCA 145. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Philipp Kreutzer (Applicant) University of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Tronson (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate