NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Field v R [2015] NSWCCA 332 Hearing dates: 27 November 2015 Decision date: 23 December 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Johnson J at [103]; R A Hulme J at [107] Decision: Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence granted but the appeals dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – manslaughter – whether verdict unreasonable or not supported by the evidence – inconsistencies between witness accounts – inconsistencies did not give rise to doubt about whether applicant responsible for delivering fatal blow – no witness saw deceased struck by another person – jurors advantage in seeing and hearing witnesses give evidence – verdict not unreasonable or unsupported
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – manslaughter – deceased died as a result of a single punch on leaving a hotel - whether sentence manifestly excessive – challenges to fact finding by primary judge – facts were open to be found – favourable subjective case – need for sentence to reflect objective serious of offence and need for general deterrence – sentence not unreasonable or unjust Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 18, 24 Crims (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A(3)(e)-(h) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 128 Cases Cited: BCM v The Queen [2013] HCA 48; 88 ALJR 101 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) [1984] HCA 7; 153 CLR 521 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mohamed v R [2008] NSWCCA 45 Morris v The Queen [1987] HCA 50; 163 CLR 454 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; 228 CLR 618 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 Sio v R [2015] NSWCCA 42 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Turnbull v Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage [2015] NSWCCA 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Steven Field (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Bellanto QC (Applicant) N Noman SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate