NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sedgwick v Varzonek (No. 3) [2015] NSWSC 1982 Hearing dates: 30 October 2015 Date of orders: 23 December 2015 Decision date: 23 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: A specified gross sum costs order assessed under Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c). The plaintiff's costs are assessed in the sum of $175,000. Catchwords: COSTS - application for specified gross sum costs order under Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) - whether a specified gross sum costs order should be made - successful plaintiff entitled to ordinary costs up to 24 July 2014 and indemnity costs thereafter -what is the appropriate assessment of the plaintiff's lump sum.
INTEREST – claim for interest on judgment sum – appropriate rate of interest. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Batchelor v Burke [1981] HCA 30; 148 CLR 448 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Harrison v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213; 54 NSWLR 738 Maestrale v Aspite [2014] NSWCA 182 Newcastle City Council v Wieland (2009) 74 NSW LR 173 [2009] NSWCA 113 Sedgwick v Varzonek [2015] NSWSC 1275 Sedgwick v Varzonek (No.2) [2015] NSWSC 1613 Texts Cited: GE Dal Pont, The Law of Costs (3rd ed 2013, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Richard Charles Sedgwick Defendant: Krystyna Varzonek Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: M. Willmott SC; A. Blank Defendant: P. O'Loughlin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate