NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O'Connor v Kerr (No. 2) [2015] NSWLEC 1542 Hearing dates: 2 October 2015 Date of orders: 23 December 2015 Decision date: 23 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Registrar Gray Decision: 1.The applicant pay 50% of the respondent's costs of the proceedings from 23 June 2015 to 29 July 2015, as agreed or assessed. 2.The applicant pay the respondent the sum of $440 for the cost of engaging the arborist to provide an expert report in the proceedings. 3.The applicant pay the respondent's legal professional costs of the notice of motion filed 1 September 2015, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS: Tree dispute application; Application dismissed on all grounds; Whether fair and reasonable to order costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 3.7 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Fox v Ginsberg (No 3) [2011] NSWLEC 139 O'Connor v Kerr [2015] NSWLEC 1285 Whitehouse Properties Pty Ltd v Bond Brewing (NSW) Ltd (1992) 28 NSWLR 17 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Category: Costs Parties: Raymond O'Connor (Applicant) Nicole Kerr (Respondent) Representation: Applicant Mr O'Connor (in person)
Respondent Ms Kerr (in person) File Number(s): 20436 of 2015
JUDGMENT 1. On 11 May 2015 the applicant made an application under both s 7 Part 2 and s 14B Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 ('the Trees Act') for orders concerning trees growing on an adjoining property, owned by the respondent. The application was made on the basis that the applicant alleged that the trees would cause damage to property or obstruction to sunlight in the future. The proceedings came before Commissioner Fakes for an onsite hearing on 29 July 2015 and on the same day (in O'Connor v Kerr [2015] NSWLEC 1285) she declined to make the orders sought and dismissed the application. The respondent now seeks her costs of the proceedings. That application is made by notice of motion filed 1 September 2015, and is supported by affidavits of the respondent, Ms Kerr, on 1 September and 21 September 2015.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate