NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sarkis v Greyhound Racing New South Wales [2015] NSWSC 1987 Hearing dates: 22 December 2015 Decision date: 23 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Amended summons dismissed with costs Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of decision of regulator of greyhound racing industry to suspend registration of greyhound trainer and breeder – whether jurisdictional error established – whether prerogative relief should be denied because of availability of appeal to specialised tribunal Legislation Cited: Greyhound Racing Act 2009 (NSW) Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Farley [2001] NSWSC 326; 51 NSWLR 494 Day v Harness Racing New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 423; 88 NSWLR 594 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50 Texts Cited: M Aronson and M Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, (5th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2013) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Harry Sarkis (Plaintiff) Greyhound Racing New South Wales (First Defendant) Karen Lees (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A P Cheshire SC (Plaintiff) J C Giles SC (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate