NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Kamm (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1 Hearing dates: 13 & 14 December 2015 Date of orders: 08 January 2016 Decision date: 08 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Order pursuant to s 5C of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 that William Kamm be subject to a high risk sex offender extended supervision order for a period of 5 years from today.
(2) Direct pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 for the period of the high risk sex offender extended supervision order that William Kamm comply with the conditions set out in the SCHEDULE to these orders. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – serious sex offender – whether defendant a high risk sex offender – whether high risk sex offender extended supervision order should be made Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Amendment Act 2010 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Amendment Act 2013 Cases Cited: Attorney General of New South Wales v McGuire [2015] NSWSC 152 Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v GTR [2008] WASCA 187; (2008) 198 A Crim R 149 Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v Williams [2007] WASCA 206; (2007) 176 A Crim R 110 Kamm v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 201 Kamm v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 290 New South Wales v Bowdidge [2015] NSWSC 717 State of New South Wales v Conway [2011] NSWSC 588 State of New South Wales v Cruse [2013] NSWSC 1733 State of New South Wales v Darrego [2011] NSWSC 360 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Fisk [2013] NSWSC 364 State of New South Wales v Kamm [2015] NSWSC 1492 State of New South Wales v Lynn [2015] NSWSC 665 State of New South Wales v Mackey (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1153 State of New South Wales v McQuilton [2014] NSWSC 11 State of New South Wales v Richardson (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 276 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 State of New South Wales v Tillman [2008] NSWSC 1293 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) William Kamm (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Freckleton QC with David Kell P D Lange with D Carroll
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate