NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Larney v Roads and Maritime Services [2016] NSWCATOD 4 Hearing dates: 7 October 2015 Date of orders: 14 January 2016 Decision date: 14 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Kelly - Senior Member Decision: The decision made on 29 May 2015 to affirm the decision to refuse the applicant's application for an authority to drive taxi-cabs is affirmed Catchwords: Passenger transport – taxi-cab driver authorisation – whether the applicant is of good repute and in all other respects a fit and proper person to be the driver of a taxi-cab Legislation Cited: Passenger Transport Act 1990 (NSW) ss 33, 33B and 54 Passenger Transport Regulation 2007 cll 29 and 44 Cases Cited: Re T and the Director of Youth and Community Services [1980] 1 NSWLR 392 Z v Director General, Department of Transport [2000] NSWADT 87 Mahe v Director General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 266 Singh v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 96 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Larney (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: P Larney (Applicant in person) Smythe Wozniak Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 1520118
Judgment
The decision under review 1. The applicant, Peter Larney, seeks the review of the decision made on internal review by the Roads and Maritime Services (the respondent) on 29 May 2015 to affirm the decision to refuse the applicant's application for an authority to drive a taxi-cab. 2. I note that there is a typing error in the delegate's internal review decision which, while referring to the application for authorisation to drive taxi-cabs, affirms the decision to refuse his application to drive "buses".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate