NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamdan v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 6 Hearing dates: 27 November 2015 Date of orders: 20 January 2016 Decision date: 20 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Lucy - Senior Member Decision: The respondent's refusal of the applicant's application for restoration of his contractor licence is affirmed. Catchwords: HOME BUILDING – Licence cancelled on ground that it was issued because of a misrepresentation or that it was issued in error - Application for restoration of cancelled licence – Applicable provisions for determining application – Whether necessary for Tribunal to be satisfied that error rectified before it may restore licence – Whether errors in application rectified Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Home Building Amendment Act 2014 (NSW) Licensing and Registration (Uniform Procedures) Act 2002 (NSW) Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hamdan v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATOD 114 The Ombudsman v Laughton (2005) 64 NSWLR 114 Smith v R (1994) 181 CLR 338 Anthony Hordern & Sons Ltd v Amalgamated Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia (1932) 47 CLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abdul Hamdan (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Paul Bard Lawyers (Applicant) Fair Trading Legal Services, Office of Finance and Services (Respondent) File Number(s): 1520114
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate