NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Landmark Group Australia Pty Limited v Holroyd City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1564 Hearing dates: 16,17,18 November 2015 Date of orders: 13 January 2016 Decision date: 13 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See orders and directions at pars 58, 90 and 124 Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: three separate but related appeals for the erection of residential flat buildings - building setbacks - building separation - inadequate balcony space - solar access – communal open space - temporary access - internal amenity Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013 Cases Cited: State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2006 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65
Modern Motels Pty Limited v Fairfield City Council [2013] NSWLEC 138 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Landmark Group Australia Pty Limited (Applicant) Holroyd City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Galasso SC (Applicant) Mr A Seton, solicitor (Respondent)
Solicitors: Gadens (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 10616 of 2015, 10617 of 2015, 10654 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: These are three separate but related appeals against the refusal by Holroyd City Council of three separate development applications for the erection of 4 residential flat buildings on land at 1-7 and 9-11 Neil Street, Merrylands (the site). 2. The appeals are set out below and shown on the plan on the following page: * Appeal No 10616 of 2015 - Development Application DA 2015/202 proposes the construction of a 9 storey residential flat building containing 137 residential units over 3 levels of basement car parking and associated stormwater and landscape works. This building is known as Building 1 in the development of the site. * Appeal No 10617 of 2015 - Development Application DA2015/63 proposes the construction of two buildings known as Buildings 5 and 6 in the development of the site. . Proposed Building 5 is 4 storeys in height and contains 14 units, and proposed Building 6 is 10 storeys in height and contains 103 units. The buildings are constructed over 2 levels of basement car parking and include associated stormwater and landscape works. * Appeal No 10654 of 2015 – Development Application DA2015/203 proposes the construction of a 9 storey residential flat building containing 93 residential units over 3 levels of basement car parking, temporary access and associated stormwater and landscape works. This building is known as Building 2 in the development of the site.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate