NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Sen Van TRAN [2015] NSWDC 324 Hearing dates: 22 May, 16 October 2015 Date of orders: 16 October 2015 Decision date: 16 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Knox SC DCJ Decision: A head sentence of nine years with a non-parole period of imprisonment of five years and three months. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – supplying buprenorphine in a quantity not less than the large commercial quantity – circumstantial case – absence of evidence of purpose to supply – special circumstances - deemed supply - deterrence - offence involving subverting drug diversion programme Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25 and 29 Cases Cited: Adams v R [2008] HCA 15; 234 CLR 143 Chen v R [2011] NSWCCA 145 Deakin v R [2014] NSWCCA 121 Hampton v R [2014] NSWCCA 131 Hsu v R [2012] NSWCCA 248 Kwon v R [2011] NSWCCA 58 Melikian v R [2008] NSWCCA 156 Paxton v R (2011) 219 A Crim R 104 R v AZ [2011] NSWCCA 43 R v Bimahendali [1999] NSWCCA 409; 109 A Crim R 355 R v Niass (unreported NSWCCA, 16 November 1998) Tan v R [2014] NSWCCA 96 Wong v R; Leung v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Sen Van Tran (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms Kate Nightingale (Crown) Mr Frank Santisi (Defence)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate