NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TC v R [2016] NSWCCA 3 Hearing dates: 2 November 2015 Date of orders: 02 February 2016 Decision date: 02 February 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Rothman J at [88]; Bellew J at [89] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – historical indecent assault by young person on 9 year old boy contrary to s 81 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – further historical indecent assault on 12 year old girl contrary to s 76 of the Crimes Act on a Form 1 – sentencing judge convicted applicant and imposed 2 year good behaviour bond – whether sentencing judge failed to into account the sentencing options under the Child Welfare Act 1939 (NSW) – whether the sentencing judge failed to sentence in accordance with standards at time of the offence – whether sentence unreasonable or plainly unjust – whether the sentencing judge erred by recording conviction – whether no lesser sentence warranted in law Legislation Cited: Child Welfare Act 1939 (NSW) ss 4, 12, 20, 83 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) s 14 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 9, 10, 10A, 32, 37 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 76, 81 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Miscellaneous Acts (Community Welfare) Repeal and Amendment Act 1987 (NSW) Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) s 5 Cases Cited: A v Commissioner, New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People [2000] NSWADT 151 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Chin v Ryde City Council [2004] NSWCCA 167; 133 LGERA 312 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 252 CLR 601 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 Magnuson v R [2013] NSWCCA 50 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 59 Morgan v R (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 Papworth v R [2011] NSWCCA 253 R v Boney (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), Grove J, 22 July 1991, unrep) R v DJS [2001] NSWCCA 189 R v Hutchins (1958) 75 WN (NSW) 75 R v Magrin [2004] NSWCA 354 R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51 R v McLeod (Supreme Court (NSW), Maxwell J, 21 March 1983, unrep) R v MJR [2002] NSWCCA 129; 54 NSWLR 368 R v Moon [2000] NSWCCA 534; 117 A Crim R 497 R v Paris [2001] NSWCCA 83 R v PL [2008] NSWDC 66 R v Price [2005] NSWCCA 285 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 SW v R [2013] NSWCCA 255 Walden v Hensler [1987] HCA 54; 163 CLR 561 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TC (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann SC / E Anderson (Applicant) J Pickering SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate