NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pollicina and Others v Hume Coal Pty Ltd; Roche & Anor v Hume Coal Pty Ltd; Martin & Anor v Hume Coal Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 1571 Hearing dates: 16 November 2015 Date of orders: 16 November 2015 Decision date: 16 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 8 Before: Dixon C Decision: See paragraph [10] Catchwords: APPEAL – Mining – Review of access arrangements – adjournment application Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Mining Act 1992 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 No 28 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Pollicina (First Applicant of 2015/80476) Fesen Pty Ltd (Second Applicant of 2015/80476) Kathleen Roche (First Applicant of 2015/80815) John Roche (Second Applicant of 2015/80815) Kimberley Martin (First Applicant of 2015/80825) Peter Michael Martin (Second Applicant of 2015/80825) Hume Coal Pty Ltd (Respondent of 2015/80476, 2015/80815 and 2015/80825) Representation: Counsel: Robert White with Marylou Potts (Solicitor) (Applicants of 2015/80476, 2015/80815 and 2015/80825) Richard Beasley SC with Amy Knox (Respondent of 2015/80476)
Solicitors: Marylou Potts Pty Ltd (Applicants of 2015/80476, 2015/80815 and 2015/80825) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent of 2015/80476) File Number(s): 80476 of 201580815 of 201580825 of 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate