NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alkhair v R [2016] NSWCCA 4 Hearing dates: 6 November 2015 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Rothman J at [72]; Bellew J at [73] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Refuse the applicant leave under r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules to rely upon his grounds of appeal against conviction insofar as that leave was necessary; (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – aggravated break and enter– application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence – applicable principles where incompetence of trial counsel alleged – whether reasonable explanation for counsel's conduct of trial – whether miscarriage of justice occurred – whether sentence manifestly excessive – parity – leave under r 4 Criminal Appeal Rules refused – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 112(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Cases Cited: Ahmu v R [2014] NSWCCA 312 Ali v R [2005] HCA 8; 79 ALJR 662 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Matthews v R [2013] NSWCCA 187 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; 80 ALJR 614 Outram v R [2013] NSWCCA 329 R v Birks [1990] 19 NSWLR 677 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; 212 CLR 124 Vella v R [2015] NSWCCA 148 Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14; 212 CLR 629 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adnan Alkhair (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) M Cinque SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate