NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Australian Executor Trustees Limited; Creighton v Australian Executor Trustees Limited [2016] NSWSC 17 Hearing dates: 8 December 2015 Decision date: 05 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ball J Decision: See paragraphs 48 to 50 of this judgment. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – competing proceedings – whether one proceeding should be stayed – whether other orders should be made in relation to the conduct of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Class Proceeding Act 1992 (On) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Branir Pty Ltd v Wallco Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (2006) 203 FLR 115 Commissioner of State Revenue v Aidlaw Pty Ltd [2010] VSC 405. Kirby v Centro Properties Limited [2008] FCA 1505; (2008) 253 ALR 65 Lidden v Composite Buyers Ltd (1996) 139 ALR 549 Locking v Armtec Infrastructure 2013 ONSC 331 Mancinelli et al v Barrick Gold Corporation et al 2015 ONSC 2717 Moore v Inglis (1976) 9 ALR 509 Thirteenth Corporation Pty Ltd v State (2006) 232 ALR 491 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Smith and Rosemary Smith (Plaintiffs 2015/171592) Innes Creighton (Plaintiff 2015/306222) Australian Executor Trustee Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: AS Martin SC with GM Drew (Plaintiffs 2015/171592) MBJ Lee SC with Ms J McDonald (Plaintiffs 2015/306222) M Darke SC with P Knowles (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate