NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ibrahim v R [2016] NSWCCA 6 Date of orders: 10 February 2016 Decision date: 10 February 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Rothman J at [2] Bellew J at [4] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentence – Applicant pleaded guilty mid-trial to attempting to possess a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – Psychologist's report tendered on sentence diagnosed applicant as having a mild mental retardation – No submissions were put to sentencing judge regarding the applicability of principles pertaining to mentally ill offenders – Whether primary judge erred in failing to sentence the applicant according to such principles – Whether serious injustice arose as a consequence of the failure of counsel to put such submissions – No injustice established - No error established
CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentence – Where applicant played a significant role in the importation of a commercial quantity of opium – Whether sentencing judge had proper regard to the applicant's subjective circumstances – Seriousness of offending – Need for general deterrence – Sentence of 12 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 7 years and 6 months not manifestly excessive – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dicianni v R; Pintabona v R [2015] NSWCCA 201 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 Garcia v R [2013] NSWCCA 241 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v El Kaharni (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 R v Bavadra [2000] NSWCCA 292; (2000) 115 A Crim R 152 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; (2010) 205 A Crim R 106 R v Riddell [2009] NSWCCA 96; (2009) 194 A Crim R 524 R v Todd (NSWCCA unreported, 7 February 1994) Romero v R [2011] VSCA 45; (2011) 32 VR 486 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hanan Mohamad Ibrahim (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W Hunt (Applicant) P R McGuire SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate